I PLAY “MUSICAL CARTS” TO SAVE SOME DOUGH

January 2nd, 2012
DJ Photo

D.J. Adams, Business Development Exec., Interactive Advertising

Have you noticed online retailers offering discounts to avoid “cart abandonment?”

Lately, I’ve been blatantly taking advantage of this phenomenon, without any lingering guilt.

AT LEAST ABANDONED ONLINE SHOPPING CARTS
DON’T DENT YOUR CAR DOORS

I frequently order car parts online. Like most consumers, I comparison shop online retailers and then compare those prices to local auto-parts stores. I consider sales tax vs. shipping charges and other factors to eventually get the best price.

I’ll go through the complete online purchase process, up to calculating shipping costs. Then, I’ll jot down the total price and “dump” the cart to shop another site.

More often, when I attempt to close the browser window, I see a pop-up, offering a discount as incentive to complete the purchase.

I find myself thinking, “Well, why didn’t they offer me 20% off to begin with?”

I reason that if their profit margins can support that discount, they’re overcharging me from “Jump Street.” Thus, I make the purchase with a clear conscious and no subsequent sleep loss about it.

So now, I REGULARLY abandon online shopping carts, LOOKING for a discount.

Does that make me a bad person? Or am I just a savvy shopper.

Either way, anti-cart-abandonment strategies are something we’re going to have to watch. A great Interactive Marketing company has to stay on top of the latest digital trends.

QRCs AREN’T TAKING OFF? COULD BE THE LANDING

December 29th, 2011
DJ Adams

Dj Adams, AdTex Interactive Business Development Exec.

Some web research shows up to 42% of Americans use smartphones now. Some reports show 63.2 million Americans have smartphones. Including tablets and other “smart” devices, that percentage could be as high as 50. But hey, this is blogging, not “real” journalism. So, let’s go ahead and play “fast and loose” with the figures and settle on…oh, let’s say 46.9%.

The point is, a BUNCH of folks have and use mobile devices that are capable of reading Quick Response or QR codes. You know, those square, squiggly not-bar code thingies you see printed everywhere.

You see them. But, how often do you actually whip out your smartphone, punch up an app and scan them?

Yeah, me neither.

Our unofficial polls (actually a couple of folks we asked in the supermarket line) have revealed that actual scanning of QRCs has been underwhelming at best in the U.S. (we hear it’s more prolific in Japan).

We believe much QRC apathy can be attributed to weak landing strategy.

Many early users (like me) were disappointed when we took the time to scan a QRC on a print ad, handbill or point-of-purchase display, only to land on the marketer’s website’s homepage. Heck, I could have arrived there faster from a mobile-optimized search engine app, like Yahoo! for my iPhone.

Do you think there are better, more useful places for QRCs to drop off users?

We recommend landing on videos. Preferably videos on your website. Besides promoting your product or service, this strategy could help drive traffic and get better search results for your site.

How about;

• QRCs in printed catalogs and brochures that land on short video testimonials of actual customers using the product or service?

• QRCs for each product in a catalog, that land on brief how-to videos for products that require assembly or installation?

• QRCs on point-of-purchase displays, landing on abbreviated videos showing the product in use?

• QRCs, strategically placed at trade shows and exhibitions that land on +/-10-sec. videos of a spokesperson providing quick directions and a “call-to-action” invitation to your booth?

Notice a couple of themes here? We always recommend video, because it’s economical and proven to offer more interactive engagement. Then there’s brevity. Mobile users seem to have short attention spans (unless they’re watching a movie). And remember, we’re not talking major Hollywood productions, here, You should use low-cost, quick, high-quality, engaging video clips with a clear call to action.

I know a great Interactive Marketing Company that can economically get all this done for you.

AdTex Contact Video QRC

MESSING WITH A BRAND WILL STILL GET YOU IN A HEAP OF TROUBLE

December 6th, 2011
DJ Photo

D.J. Adams, Business Development Exec., Interactive Advertising

I recently met three brilliant, twentysomething creative professionals. The two young men are great designers and the young lady is a multitalented designer/copywriter. They are recent, proud graduates or seniors at the outstanding local art college. We were gathered at an obnoxiously loud restaurant/sports bar for a creative group portfolio review. As they bared their work for constructive criticism by a seasoned designer and I (I’m a copywriter, by trade), I gave them what, I hope, is a helpful bit of advice.

“Go home, find the Westerns channel on TV and watch Bonanza.”

Explanation time, huh?

Well, during the gathering, I kept hearing that familiar buzzword, “BRANDING.”

I asked each of the young professionals how they defined branding? Their answers, though varied, were well thought out and reflected their fine training in advertising. So, being the grizzled industry veteran, I felt obliged to let the whippersnappers know” that thar branding ain’t exactly anything new.”

BACK THEN, IT WAS MORE ABOUT THE BEEF THAN THE BUZZ

If the young’uns catch a Bonanza marathon, they will likely come across an episode with the Cartwright clan winning a bloody range war, fought about their rustled cattle. How do we know the Cartwright’s beeves were pilfered? By their…wait for it…BRAND, of course!

As cruel as it seems, I believe nothing has effectively replaced branding as the method working ranches identify their livestock. Each operation has a unique mark and fiercely protects it. So does the law. Who knows? Cattle rustling might still be a “hanging” crime in my home state, Texas.

By the way, did you know that the original Bonanza series was created for branding? I toured the now-closed Ponderosa Ranch five or six times. The gloriously scenic (yet kind of cheesy), tourist attraction overlooked Lake Tahoe, in Incline Village, Nevada (most scenes were actually shot in Hollywood). Tours of the Cartwright’s ranch house were offered. The house was filled with series and production props, including the gigantic, RCA (then Radio Corporation of America) studio cameras. RCA was the parent company of NBC, who produced and aired the series. RCA used the show to boost sales of RCA-manufactured color television sets. RCA was also the primary sponsor of the series for the first two seasons.

We now return to my little branding “history lesson”; the reason for such fervent defense of brands is the same for big corporations, small businesses and working ranches — money! Alteration of, or infringement upon a brand can hinder the owners’ ability to capitalize on all the income that ownership of the mark could afford. Those altering a logo are akin to the dirty sidewinders that would make a bootleg half-circle branding iron to turn a “Rocking “R” to “Circle B”.

So, our branding conversation eventually led to my lamentation about the current devaluation of professional business ID packages. This hit home recently, as I was driving behind a truck plastered with advertising for cheap print marketing. One of the packages printed on the vehicle’s wrap included two logos, 1000 full-color 8.5×11” fliers, two magnetic car signs and one yard sign…all for $179.99. Just a few years back, a small/midsize business might pay an agency a couple of thousand dollars for a powerful, intensively conceived logotype package with a robust use guide (rigid limitations for color, orientation, surrounding space, etc.). For companies serious about competing, the expense was well worth it.

I felt better when one of the young creatives said, “When you pay for a $50 logo, you get a $50 logo.” He understood the inherent value in a mark created by a professional.

I attribute much of the aforementioned devaluation of these types of services to internet-based practices like crowdsourcing, I’m sure the $180 logo design (actually probably done for much less) was created by the lowest bidder on a crowdsourcing site like Fiverr.com. It’s a sign of the digital times, I reckon.

So, considering “branding” has replaced “advertising” and “media” is now “content”, what practices do we change?” A company’s best financial interest is still served by a strong brand, that’s well conceived and fiercely protected. A good law firm can help with the latter…hopefully without an all-out range war. As for the former, I know a great Interactive Marketing Company to recommend.

AdTex Branding Postcard Front

A Postcard by AdTex Advertising, 2005

FACEBOOK. STARBUCKS. SAME DIFFERENCE.

September 27th, 2011

D.J. Adams, Business Development Exec., Interactive Advertising

BOTH ARE FREE HANGOUTS
BOTH ARE THERE TO SELL YOU SOMETHING

The most recent “Facebook to charge users” hoax created even more opportunities to tout my interminable “Content is Key” Social Media strategy.

So many of my Facebook “friends” shared that ridiculous post about the gigantic (now over 800,000,000 mostly active, users) social network becoming a user-pay service (if they didn’t post a paragraph on their newsfeeds before midnight) that I felt the rare need to explain (via a brief newsfeed post on my personal profile) Facebook’s moneymaking strategy.

Here’s what I said: “For those of you seeing that newsfeed about Facebook becoming a “for-pay” service, note that IT IS A HOAX! It is highly unlikely that FB will ever need user funding. What most fail to grasp is that Facebook is about ADVERTISING! Those ads you see on the right of the page more than monetize operations. Notice that the ads seem to be for stuff in which you are interested? They are targeted specifically to you by the info YOU put in your profile. You made it public when you accepted the user agreement (that most of us don’t read). With over 800 million (mostly active) users to have advertising targeting to them, FB will never have to charge for users to “socialize”. While you are, you’re being bombarded…if only subliminally, by paid-for advertising.”

I’ve found that the easiest way to convey Facebook’s money model to many prospective small-to-midsize business clients is to liken Facebook to the “800-lb. gorilla” of coffee retailing, Starbucks.

Both Starbucks and Facebook are FREE HANGOUTS. But make no mistake, the content to which you’re constantly exposed at both, are craftily designed to separate you from some hard-earned bucks.

You can park your tuckus in Starbucks and use the free wireless internet connection and soak up their climate control all day long. I don’t believe the employees are ever going to come over and insist you drop a couple of ducats for a cup of joe.

Well, why are they providing the free, unlimited wi-fi and letting you hang out at their establishment?

In a word, CONTENT!

While “socializing”, checking emails or playing Angry Birds at Starbucks, you’re consistently being exposed to visual, aural and even olfactory media. (“Media” is the old, “analog” word for the new, digital “CONTENT.”)

The marketing principle holds that you will eventually be overcome by the enticing aroma of Starbucks’ beverages, the ever-present logo, the consistent green-colored branding graphics and even the sounds of the in-store “radio” ads and those beverage machines.

“Just keep sitting there, pal. You’ll soon give in and buy a delectable Pumpkin Spice Latte, scrumptious Panini or mouthwatering butter croissant.”

The same holds true with Facebook marketing. You can post, chat, “like”, “friend” and play CityVille 24 hours a day (and I believe there are people who do). Facebook will never need to charge you a cent. Those ads are reaching someone…maybe not you today…but someone, somewhere, sometimes.

What keeps you on Facebook for so long? CONTENT! Who is creating most of that content? You and your friends are. And guess what, you’re not being paid a dime to do it! It’s a brilliant marketing scheme!

The shared videos, links and not-as-effective textual newsfeeds keep you engaged with Facebook. The more content that captures your attention, the longer you linger on Facebook pages. The longer you’re there, the more you’re subjected to targeted ads. It’s the proverbial “Win-Win” for advertisers and especially Facebook.

GOOD CONTENT CREATION IS STILL A TOUGH SELL TO SMALL/MIDSIZE BUSINESSES

I marvel at marketing decision-makers’ reluctance or sheer inability to grasp the importance of effective content and the relationship-building nature of Social Media marketing. I know many businesses don’t want to pay someone to handle it for them. I covered that in my “Social Media Marketing is Not Free” blog post. In my “A Client Lost…” post, I told how we lost a client who was unwilling to work at it.

Many of our prospective (I keep using “prospective”, because our few current clients are committed to the effective strategy we offer) clients know they need to utilize Social Media Marketing. But, even some who are seasoned traditional marketers, don’t know how or why (except for justifying it in light of the staggering numbers, like the aforementioned 800,000,000 Facebook users).

I always ask them “Are you considering Social Media Marketing to tell more people what you’re selling?” The answer is invariably “Yes”. My subsequent assertion that they are about to make a common and expensive mistake is met with emotional responses ranging from shock to anger at me for doubting their marketing prowess. I hope I effectively explained it in my “Don’t Tell…Anything” blog post.

Constantly telling your Facebook “likers”, Twitter followers and YouTube subscribers what you’re peddling is akin to the Starbucks employee frequently coming to your table to interrupt your socializing with annoying reminders about the stuff they’re selling. Such behavior in a “hangout” tends to run people away. That goes for Social Media, too.

Modern interactive marketing requires a new way of thinking. Though time consuming and sometime labor intensive, it’s relatively easy. Plus good guys like me give away loads of info about it in blog posts like this. But, when you’re ready for the critical application of these strategies to grow your business, I know a great little interactive marketing agency that will save you some money.

DOWN WITH DIVERSITY

July 12th, 2011

DJ Adams

Dj Adams, AdTex Interactive Business Development Exec.

These days, when one ethnic group or another appears slighted in representation or compensation, companies tend to call for “Diversity”. You’ve’ heard the catchphrases: “diversity initiative”, diversity training, diversity program.”

First, let’s get the requisite working definitions out of the way. From Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary:
Diverse: “Differing from one another.”
Include: “To take in or comprise as part of a whole.”

As king of my own little advertising realm, I hereby decree diversity be put to death and replaced by INCLUSIVENESS.

Long live inclusiveness!

Too bad my realm is mostly imaginary. Companies are likely going to continue to do what they’ve seen the others do, because basically, People Are Sheep.

THE BIZMART STORY

Please indulge me in another one of my true tales; It’s one that will hopefully illustrate the difference between diversity and inclusiveness.

Back in the early 90s, I was a copywriter for a now-defunct (they eventually became OfficeMax) national chain of office-supply superstores called BizMart. Once, we were at a local store, shooting a TV commercial. There were lights, cameras and lots of action around our company spokesperson, baseball legend, Nolan Ryan. I believe there were a couple of paid actors playing store-staff members and some store employees were used as extras. I was moving about with the company “brass” and the creative director, who noted that the gigantic store didn’t look busy enough. There were not enough customers. The call went out to recruit some more already-being-paid employees (read: free talent) from the corporate office (which was only a couple of miles away) to fill in as extras. Then came a discussion about which employees might look good in the commercial. Everyone involved in the discussion just happened to be a white male. Everyone they recommended happened to be a white male or white female. This was understandable. Most of the people they dealt with daily were so. In the 12-person or so Advertising Department, I was the only non-white for most of the time I worked there (an African American college student briefly worked there, part time).

I surveyed the situation and observed that there was only one notably “ethnic” person in the building and I was likely the only African American. But, when I chimed in with my unsolicited suggestion, I didn’t take the obvious path.

I said. “How about the attractive lady in the wheelchair?”

You would have thought I had “let one rip” in church!

There was silence. Then, after they realized I was still standing there, waiting for an answer, an awkward “pro/con” discussion commenced. The discussion included the possibility of the mobility challenged employee “turning off” some potential customers.

A little background: I had noticed the attractive young white lady, who happened to be mobility challenged, at the corporate office. I didn’t know her name, nor had I ever spoken with her. I didn’t know in what department she worked. Many mornings, we arrived at the same time. What got my attention was her car. I love V8-powered, rear-wheel-drive American muscle. She drove the closest thing to it, in the 90s, a new Monte Carlo SS. Her Chevy had such a wicked-sounding exhaust note.

Meanwhile back at the store, I held my ground and argued my case. I asked, “People in wheelchairs don’t buy office supplies?” “Would customers be repulsed if she were a male war veteran, who lost limbs in Operation Desert Shield? “How do we know she’s not a disabled veteran?” I even played the “man card”. “Ya’ll ain’t noticed how pretty she is?”

The CD, who is a good guy and still a friend, convinced the brass to have someone locate the lady. She agreed to participate and everything was great! I think the company received a bit of praise for the “diversity”. I don’t know if it was relative, but it seemed like, thereafter I started seeing more and more mobility challenged models in retailers’ print ads and commercials.

Is the good part of this story the fact that she was included because of her diversity or difference?

Of course not! She’s not different.

How many folks in that store DIDN’T have some kind of challenge? Someone was likely an alcoholic, someone had low esteem, someone was depressed, someone was hyperactive, someone was worried, someone had diabetes, someone suffered from migraines, someone had delusions of grandeur. I’m dyslexic and have been known to suffer from coulrophobia and maimouphobia. Get the picture?

The good part is she was included for NOT being different.

Personally, I have noticed a trend in advertising and entertainment that seems to actually signal a reduction in inclusiveness. I haven’t done extensive research, or looked at current statistical info. But to me, it looks like more ads with multiple models have fewer black people. I have also glanced at some of the newest ensemble-cast television shows (those that you wouldn’t label “afro-centric”) and there seem to be fewer black cast members.

IT’S ABOUT SEEING SOMEONE THAT LOOKS LIKE YOU

My beloved sweetheart marvels at my observations and often comments, “Only you would notice that.” I usually tell her that, “It’s all just about seeing someone that looks like you.”

When you were a child, did you ever attend a function with your parents and were the first child there? Remember your excitement when the second child arrived with their parents? Even if the other child was a stranger, you felt more comfortable seeing someone like you. You didn’t have to have something against adults to feel this way.

Some folks know I was once on a NASCAR racing team. The driver, a good friend is a popular, veteran driver in the NASCAR Camping World Truck Series and is running a few Sprint Cup races, this season. He still invites my best friend Tim and I to races at Texas Motor Speedway, his “home” track. Years ago, we would roam the garage area and always made a point to visit with then-Truck-Series regular, Bill Lester. Lester was the only African American to race in one of NASCAR’s top-three series. He has started races in all three. There was something interesting that usually happened at the Texas Truck Race. During the pre-race ceremonies, the drivers would ride around the track, standing in the rear of pickup trucks, waving at the crowd of tens of thousand fans. Back then, very few African Americans attended stock car races. So, Bill Lester could always spot us in the crowd. He would point at us, give us a “thumbs up” and laugh. The last time we spoke to Bill Lester in the NASCAR (who, by the way, has a “Diversity Program”) garage, he said something to the effect of “I look forward to the day when this [him being the only black driver] won’t be such a ‘story”. I added, “And you won’t be so easily able to pick Tim and I out of that big crowd.”

I bet Bill Lester, an engineer by trade, races for love of the sport and to make a living. I doubt he’s trying to make some kind of statement about race relations in racing. But I also believe it did Bill good to occasionally see some racing fans that looked like him. We had nothing against any of the other drivers, who are mostly white. But, although we were always there to support David Starr (and told everyone within earshot so), it did us good to see a driver that looks like us.

THAT’S HISTORY AND HE’S STICKING TO IT

As youngsters in our community, we were often reminded that “History” is just that, “His Story!” Many accounts of events past are told only from the teller’s perspective, sometimes with very little consideration of the actual circumstances. That’s why it’s important to consider different perspectives. My late father served in the army during World War II, My childhood best friend’s dad was a Lieutenant Colonel who also served in WWII. Coming up, they told us stories about the war and their time overseas. (Most of them involved trucks and shipping.) When the movie Saving Private Ryan opened, I recall sitting at dinner in Memphis, with about six co-workers. They were all white and younger than I (I was born in 1962). They had all been drinking and were going on about how “realistic” the film was. Annoyed, I asked them “How do we know how realistic it was?” “Did you notice any African Americans in the movie?” I said, “My father was in Normandy.” So, the first time I watched the film, I found myself looking for one of the fictional characters that could have been my dad or Lt. Col. Brooks. I don’t know if I ever saw one. But I understood all those brave white battlefield soldiers had to get their supplies and ordnance from somewhere. But I reasoned that “Maybe it just wasn’t part of the story Robert Rodat (the film’s writer, who was born in 1953, eight years after WWII ended), Steven Spielberg (born in 1946) or whoever, was trying to tell. It was just “His Story”. In your spare time, check out a reliable, historic account of the gigantic WWII supply convoy known as Red Ball Express. Then compare what you might have read to the 1950s film of the same name.

CAN I SEMA SELF IN THAT INDUSTRY?

In The BizMart Story, I alluded to my passion for things vehicular. Ours is a member company of SEMA, the gigantic Automotive Aftermarket trade association. As members, we receive SEMA News, their monthly printed publication. The June 2011 issue is approximately 184 pages. On the cover are 19 photos of the candidates for the SEMA Board of directors. They all appear to be white males. For kicks, I paged through the issue to see if anyone inside looked like me. There are approximately 73 photos with people in them. There are about six photos that include persons appearing to be white women. There is a single “ethnic-looking” man in a single ad. He’s in a group shot for a ½-page or so Hankook tire ad. Now, I’m not saying SEMA is a “racist” or “prejudiced” organization. Quite the contrary, when I have attended their huge annual trade show in Las Vegas, I have seen people of innumerable races, cultures, countries, backgrounds and both genders. I’m just saying, “When it comes time to pay our annual SEMA dues, if just subliminally, I might be thinking, “Is this organization really for me?”

The Automotive Aftermarket isn’t the only industry run by mostly white men. But in print, broadcast and digital, need it be so blatantly emphasized? Could the organization benefit from a little more inclusion?

INCLUSIVENESS FOR EVERYONE MAY BE AN OXYMORON

I’m a big boy and understand that there might be companies and organizations that simply don’t want my business. My money is effectively no good to them, because they don’t particularly want to be identified with “my demographic.” If they are a private business, that’s their business. I have choices, too.

A few years back, there was an email circulating about popular companies that practiced a secret “No Urban Directive” (“NUD”) marketing policy. African Americans were diligently sending the email to each other, but I quickly dismissed it as a hoax. Although, I did ponder the meaning of “Urban.” See, I was raised in what could be described as a lower-middle class, sometime crime-riddled, historically African-American neighborhood. Many of my schoolmates and peers have since migrated to the suburbs and are tax-paying, family folks with six-figure salaries, mortgages, 401ks, and foreign luxury vehicles. Are their dollars any greener than the young man or woman who still lives in “the ‘hood” and makes what we used to call “good money” at the nearby GM plant or gigantic defense contractor? If they’re ordering from you on the internet or from a catalog, does it matter if they’re wearing a Brooks Brothers suit or a hoodie?

‘NUFF SAID? MAYBE NOT YET

My point is, “If you want to sell something to more people (demographic targeting and so-called NUDs aside), you might try to be more inclusive of representatives that might not look like you.” “Diversity Initiatives” are less important, because their purpose is to educate people about the differences.

Many may dispute my subjective assertions in this particular post, but many also may not see the picture through my lens. Check Advertising Age or other publications that have done industry-specific demographic studies. Or just pick a group of advertising agencies’ websites in your area. Look for staff photos and see how many of them look like your humble blogger.

I can imagine how three white men, a black woman and maybe an Asian guy can leave an agency brainstorming session where they created an ad with ten people in it and neither is a Mexican woman. (Unless the product is one targeted to Mexican women). I would suggest they get in someone’s SUV and cruise through neighborhoods…a bunch of neighborhoods…where their products might be consumed. Then note what kind of people they see and at least try to include a reasonable cross section in the ads.

I’m far from obsessed with race in the entertainment and marketing industries. But as a nearly 30-year professional practitioner of the latter…and having been black for nearly fifty years…I tend to notice certain things about both.

So, as some old African American preachers like to say after a one-hour sermon, “I said all that to say this”: smart marketers should look to INCLUSION as the modern model for selling more.

If you know anyone who is looking for a great little interactive agency that knows inclusion, I can recommend one.

Down with diversity and usher in the era of INCLUSION!

A CLIENT LOST TO LETHARGY

June 18th, 2011

We lost a client last week. We’re devastated about it.

In this economy, you would think our largest lament would be the subsequent loss of income. But truth be told, the monthly revenue from this particular client was minuscule.

What is most crushing are the lost hopes of parading this client’s success as a benchmark for Social Media Marketing done right. We hoped to showcase their results as proof positive of our Social Media Marketing strategy’s effectiveness.

But alas, ‘twas not to be. Here’s what happened.

Last year, we partnered with a friend who has an agency that does email marketing for a coalition of independent specialty stores. Many of the stores’ owners expressed interest in Social Media Marketing. With the hope of adding at least half of the 200-plus stores as SM clients, we offered our services at a deeply discounted monthly rate.

We traveled to their industry’s annual trade show to present our SM plan in a “breakout” session. We left with two or three commitments to the program. Neither panned out.

We understand that offering to do someone’s Social Media Marketing is a tough sell in tight times. I covered my theory on it in the “Social Media Marketing is Not Free” blog post.

Anyway, a store that didn’t attend the show contracted us. As a show of good faith, we still offered the drastically discounted group rate for our already-low-cost service. They chose to have us create their SM sites and use our “3M” service. But they declined our affordable content-creation options, choosing to try doing it themselves (with lots of free consultation from us).

Hours were spent on the phone, discussing the retailer’s Social Media Marketing strategy, goals, plans and challenges. They were encouraged to call our offices or wireless phones with even the slightest questions or concerns. We communicated frequently. If not by phone, always at least by email.

We started by telling them how Social Media marketing takes time, planning and effort. We worked the program as planned. We spent hours educating two employees on SM best practices. We showed them how Facebook isn’t their company’s “digital message board” to talk “at” customers and tell them what’s for sale.

We taught them about engagement, interaction, Facebook as a “hangout”, blah, blah, blah… (much of the stuff that was covered in my “Don’t tell your “Likers…Anything” and “Your Company is On Facebook….” posts).

We set up their first three SM sites (after explaining how this would raise their website’s Search Ranking). They got a “tricked out” FB page with a custom canvas, “incentivized” landing page and apps. We built them a customized YouTube channel and Twitter profile.

We had our friend do an “incentivized” email to introduce their list subscribers to their new Facebook page and grow their “likerbase”.

But our best efforts were put forth providing creative ideas for them to develop engaging, customer-capturing, EdgeRank-driving content.

We suggested they buy a cheap digital video camera and do short (1-2 min. max.) videos at least weekly. We created a strategy for posting photos, helpful tips, using surveys, developing contests, asking “likers”/followers/subscribers questions, adding links back to their website, “liking” local pages and posting positive, non-promotional info on their FB walls, etc. We gave them a lengthy list of obscure holidays and suggested promotions they can create around them. We researched their local (we’re in Texas and they are in the Midwest) events and happenings that they could integrate with their SM programs. We came up with numerous creative ideas for them to manufacture “buzz”.

This retailer specializes in party supplies and is mostly staffed by women. We suggested they create a short weekly webisode series called Women on “Men”. It would be just 1-2 minutes of the women at the store, sitting around talking about the latest episode of TNT’s Ray Romano hit, Men of a Certain Age. Why this show? Because Ray Romano’s character runs an independent PARTY STORE! It would have been just a “hook” for novelty’s sake. It would be their Social Media version of ABC’s The View or CBS’ The Talk. The idea was to create low-cost web content that would develop incremental interest. Likers, followers and fans would watch to see what real, party-store-working women thought of those three whiny, middle-age men and their exploits.

About three months in, Women on “Men” and dozens of our other ideas soon were met with virtual silence. The company’s Facebook page suffered from the same malady.

In the early goings, the two or three page administrators at the store would at least post a newsfeed or two weekly. There was the occasional photo of products in the store, a special promotion around a holiday or photos of employees participating in a local event. But those became few and far between.

Once, after noticing they had gone about two weeks with no activity, I left a phone message to let them know we would be sending an email with ideas for content creation and FB newsfeeds. We proposed that if they could spare just two hours weekly, creating content (videos, photos, links, finding relative articles, etc.), we would schedule and upload their content at no additional cost. We even offered some more, mostly free, strategies.

Again, silence. What more could we have done?

Last week, I received an email with the subject line” “Discontinuing your services”. The email’s body read “[we] have decided that we don’t have the time to invest in developing our Facebook page and while you have tried to give us ideas, it is just not going anywhere. We appreciate your help in getting it going, but for now, we want to discontinue your services and we plan on letting it grow organically till we have some time to devote to its growth. Just FYI – I just found the invoice for June and gave that to our accountant to pay.”

Unfortunately, I believe they got the “grow organically” line from one of my emails. The June invoice was only about 10 days late and was the third late one in as many months. But, that’s another issue that companies like ours face.

The sad fact is many companies know they need to get involved with Social Media Marketing and either don’t know how and/or won’t take the time to learn. Their customers and competitors are out there on the sites. But they fail to embrace the reality of the need for a dedicated staffer or an economical, experienced agency to handle it. For those that are ready to step up to the plate and who choose the latter option, I know a great little company that will handle it all for you.

DON’T TELL YOUR “LIKERS”, FANS AND FOLLOWERS ANYTHING!

April 26th, 2011

“Don’t ‘TELL’ your Social Media “Likers”, fans and followers anything!”

I gave this advice to a client today.

Am I crazy? Do I have a business “death wish”? Have I been “bought” by the client’s competition?

Please allow me to explain.

The client is a proven, experienced incumbent politician. He’s facing a younger, social-media savvy opponent in an upcoming election. It’s our client’s first foray into Social Media as a campaign tool and he’s eager to tell voters about his significant contributions to his district and years of dedicated service.

But part of our job is convincing clients and potential clients that, unlike much of traditional marketing, Social Media is a two-way conversation. It isn’t about “broadcasting” your products or services to a “captive audience” of “likers”, “friends”, fans, followers or subscribers. It’s about engagement and stimulating a conversation that always comes back around to what you’re selling.

As a child, someone (possibly an educator or church mentor) asked me “How many mouths do you have?” Of course the answer was “One.” The next question was “How many ears do you have?” “Two.” I didn’t need to be hit over the head with the moral. I understood that we should spend at least twice as much time listening as talking.

This isn’t a bad marketing practice.

Speaking of “practice”, I told the councilman that one of our Social Media “Best Practices” is composing Facebook posts and tweets as questions, whenever possible. It tends to produce responses and stimulate interaction.

This works for our restaurant and retail clients:

“Today’s Special is Buffalo Chicken Sliders for $5.99” becomes “What side are you gonna’ have with your tangy, delicious $5.99 Buffalo Chicken Sliders, today?”

“We have a huge selection of Goodyear tires.” becomes “Guess how many sizes and models of Goodyear tires we carry? The closest guesser gets a free rotation, today only!”

“Get 1/2–price appetizers during the big game today.”
becomes “Who wins game six, tonight? Let’s discuss it over tasty half-price appetizers!”

“$12.99 full set nail special today.” becomes “Which co-worker is more likely to notice how great your nails look after today’s $12.99 full-set special? Let us know.”

“Our hot wings are the best!” becomes “How do our hot wings rate? We’re up to the challenge.”

Get the idea?

So, we’ll continue to advise Social Media clients to get stingy with the promotional posts. Don’t TELL them anything. ASK! Spark the conversation and you’ll soon get a chance to make your pitch. “Likers”, fans, followers and subscribers will appreciate the effort.

Successfully executing this strategy requires a knowledgeable digital agency with an experienced copywriter on board. I can recommend one.

SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING IS NOT FREE

April 12th, 2011

A business associate and I recently discussed the challenges of “monetizing” Social Media Marketing Services. We exchanged theories about why paying professionals to handle Social Media is such a tough sell to many small-to-medium-size business decision makers.

It all boiled down to the cost of the mediums (alternate plural for media) or the lack thereof. A Twitter profile, a YouTube membership, a Facebook personal profile and even a Facebook Business page all cost the user absolutely nothing.

So, the reasoning goes, “Why pay someone to do something that’s free?”

My answer is “Because Social Media is about ‘socializing’ but Social Media ‘Marketing” is about making money…and we have always been about our clients making more money!” That’s why we provide interactive advertising that engages your customers to entice them to buy your product or service.

Times are still tough and unfortunately, marketing is often where the first and deepest budgetary cuts are made. Maybe many managers think that employees are burning enough company time on Social Media sites that they can’t justify paying a full-time employee and certainly not an outside agency to do it. “Working” the Facebook page often becomes the part-time, “side” job for a staffer.

Those much-appreciated returning readers of this space are familiar with my oft-repeated “blog bites”, like “Social Media Marketing is a full-time job.”, “Many websites and Facebook pages are no more than ‘digital pamphlets’, lying on the receptionist’s desk, undistributed.”, “An unattended Facebook page is just a virtual wall covered with graffiti.” and “An effective Facebook page should be more of a ‘virtual hangout’, where the portion of Facebook’s 600 million users who have an interest in your company hang out.”

Take a look at a good selection of small-to-medium-size business Facebook pages and you’ll find loads of apathetic, occasional, text-only, one-way conversation about the company’s products or services. By now, even marginal do-it-yourself Social Media marketers know that effective work involves constant contact, two-way engagement and strong content (the visual and aural digital elements that used to be called “media”). Many of those pages aren’t even Facebook Business Pages (or still sometimes called “Fan Pages”), but are personal profiles, created by an employee who uses it as their company’s digital “message board”. Personal profiles are designed for individuals and fall way short of the inherent marketing functionality of “pages”. The practice is so pervasive that Facebook recently introduced a new tool to allow those using a personal profile for business to convert it to a Business Page.

Another common foible in the SM DIYers’ marketing plan is the belief that all of their Facebook wall posts are being seen by every “Liker” (or personal profile “friend”). They just keep writing those sometimes witty posts, sure their PC-addicted audience is soaking it all in.

It just isn’t so!

Facebook uses a powerful software solution to limit the users that see your posts. Ever notice that you don’t see all the wall posts (actually called a “newsfeed”) from all your “friends?” If you did, imagine the wall clutter with which you would be dealing.

Each item (text, photos, videos, links) you put in your newsfeed is called an “object”. Each FB user’s interaction with that object is called an “Edge”. Your “EdgeRank” is what determines how many users see your newsfeed. Certain factors (called “algorithms”) raise your EdgeRank. Maximum object interaction is key to higher EdgeRank and those text-only “announcement” wall posts are big EdgeRank downers.

We know what kind of content raises EdgeRank. We are constantly learning more about SM technology and advise our “3M” clients of our Best Practices for maximum results.

So, my point is that although Social Media sites are free, effective full-time professional Social Media marketing, though economical, is not free. Frankly, bottom-line sales results from Social Media Marketing are sometimes incremental and often nigh impossible to measure. But the modern marketing business model has shifted to full-time, relationship-based customer contact, via Social Media. Customers are on sites, discussing your industry, product or services. You need to be in on those conversations.

Whether you hire full-time staffers or use an affordable, seasoned advertising company is up to you. If you choose the latter, I know a great little company that will help with that.

NO TRACKING? NO PROBLEM!

March 10th, 2011

Replacing “Cyberstalk” Marketing With Real Relationships

Have you ever visited a website (maybe even for the first time) and automatically saw ads for products or services in which you’re interested? Were you even a little bit creeped out?

Web-visitor tracking is a favorite tool for many major marketers using analytics programs to custom-tailor targeted advertising.

But the visitor-tracking train is about to be derailed.

Privacy advocates and willing web-browser manufacturers are crippling the ability of marketers to track activity. They propose putting technology in the end-users’ hands to stop ad targeting based on individual web use. The movement is known as “Do Not Track.”

The Federal Trade Commission is pushing web-wide Do Not Track initiatives. Senator John Kerry and House Representative Ed Markey are promising to introduce bills that would limit tracking. Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) includes a powerful Do Not Track function. Nonprofit developer Mozilla is touting a Do Not Track feature for its Firefox browser.

We say “good riddance to tracking!”

The death of visitor tracking could be a boon for the proven, relationship-based Social Media Marketing methods we’ve been championing.

I won’t go into the digital dynamics of Social Media Marketing vs. Traditional practices, here. That horse is being beaten elsewhere, all over the web. We all realize that actually engaging an audience is more work than simply finding them and telling them what’s for sale and why they should buy it from you. But engagement has become the must-do, modern marketing model and consumers expect it.

Not only do they expect it, they are talking to each other about it on Social Media sites. Savvy marketers will be part of the conversation, not just “peeking in” to measure metrics, insights and analytics.

Effective Social Media Marketing is based on relationships and is inherently permission based. A little time spent customizing privacy settings, removing posts, “de-friending” and flagging can ensure you only interact with those with whom you choose. Not doing so is like complaining about a TV show with the remote in your hand.

Our simplified Social Media Marketing services for retailers, restaurants and other small-to-medium size businesses are based on four basic principles of effective communication;

1. Engagement

2. Interaction

3. Content

And one most-often absent these days,

4. Courtesy

The process usually starts with voluntary-list, branded emails with loads of links to engaging content and an “opt-out” button. Speaking of email, there has been some chatter about Facebook and Twitter replacing email. But, have you ever considered how your Social Media profiles are registered? They’re all linked to your email address. Email is still the standard for unique online identification, making it ideal for low-cost, voluntary direct contact.

So, bring on Do Not Track. We know a better way.

Thanks!

IT’S HIP TO BE SQUARE

February 16th, 2011

Designing New Logos for Facebook Business Pages

As our Social Media Services flourish, I have looked at and “Liked” several hundred new Facebook Business pages.

I keep a keen eye on the logos. Experienced marketers know a company’s logo or “mark” is a most valuable brand asset. The logo “brands” your particular product or service in the mind of consumers.

Many logos in the Facebook page Canvas (that 197-pixel-wide field in the upper left corner) are way too tiny and are often overwhelmed by the rest of the page’s graphic elements.

Most of these “lost” logos are of horizontal or rectangular orientation.

Some may have been designed back in the good old analog days, when major considerations were application on letterheads, envelopes, business cards, signs, packaging and such.

But remember, Facebook was originally conceived to showcase college student’s FACES. Faces fit well in square boxes. Unless you’re that dude from the Lemonhead® candy package.

So what to do when putting a rectangular logo in a square box?

If you can’t figure out a way around a “lost” logo in the Canvas area, you should consider making your logo as prominent as possible on your Facebook Business Page’s Landing Page. You do have a custom Landing Page, don’t you? Every Business Page should.

Savvy designers, like ours, will always make your rectangular logo work in the square space.

Professionally designed logos usually include use guidelines that prohibit altering graphic and textual logo elements. For example, you’re not likely to see the world’s most recognized brand, Coca-Cola® with one word stacked on the other and without the hyphen, just to make it a square. But notice how they incorporate other graphic components, like an illustration of the distinctively shaped bottle, around the logo (never invading a given amount of free space around the logo) for maximum flexibility of use.

Our company’s logo, designed nearly eight years ago, is rectangular. For Social Media pages, we incorporated the photo we took of a fifth generation Chevrolet Camaro. The car’s menacing fascia and glowing halo headlamp add a touch of intrigue, without overwhelming the logo and diluting the brand. It’s also fitting, as we are long-time members of SEMA, the Automotive Aftermarket Industry association.

But unlike AdTex Advertising, many of the companies coming on the Social Media scene are fresh start-ups. For these companies, it is advantageous to go ahead and design new logos with Facebook pages in mind and make them square.

Need experienced guidance with your new brand and Social Media Marketing efforts? I know a great little company that can help you with that.